Translate


Far-Right TV Host Rick Wiles: If Trump is Removed His Supporters Will ‘Hunt Down’ Democrats

Far-right evangelical talk radio host Rick Wiles asserted on Tuesday that conservative Americans will “hunt” Democrats if President Donald Trump is removed from office.

Wiles, a Florida pastor who is an ardent antisemite and conspiracy theorist, made the comments while speaking on his televised TruNews show, which is hosted on the End Times broadcasting network, during a segment about the ongoing impeachment inquiry against the president.

“If they take him out, there is going to be violence in America. There are people in this country, veterans, cowboys, mountain men, guys that know how to fight, and they’re going to make a decision that the people that did this to Donald Trump are not going to get away with it and they’re going to hunt them down,” Wiles said, before adding that he is deadly “serious.”

“If these people in Washington think that they are going to get away with it, it’s not going to happen,” he continued. “The Trump supporters are going to hunt them down. It’s going to happen and this country is going to be plunged into darkness and they brought it upon themselves because they won’t back off.”

Wiles, who refers to Jews and Muslims as “the Antichrist,” went on to say that Trump supporters “are fed up” with Democrats and the media and are on the verge of starting another civil war.

“They know if they get away this, there’s no country left it’s done, it’s finished,” he added. “When people have lost everything … they just lose it, alright, they’re going to go on a rampage and you’re not going to be able to put it back in the bottle.”

Wiles’ co-host then chimed in to say, “Once the blood starts flowing, it’s nearly impossible to stop.”

While Wiles’ violent TruNews commentary is on the more extreme end of the right-wing media world, he is far from the only conservative pundit to push civil war rhetoric. Daily Wire founder and popular podcast host Ben Shapiro threatened to “pick up a gun” earlier this month in response to Democratic presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke’s proposed policy of stripping religious institutions of their tax exempt status if they discriminate against LGBTQ people. Fox Business host Trish Regan recently insisted that America is nearing a “breaking point in terms of an emotional civil war with violence that will spill into our streets.”

 <iframe title="vimeo-player" src="https://player.vimeo.com/video/368284642" width="640" height="360" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Rehearsal # 1: Canzoni Italiane e quarantena

The Oscar's Stories #11: China (was) 'vicina' (close)

National Emblem of the People's Republic of China (2).svg

(Warning for the reader: these are some snapshots in the memory of the trips made in China. They do not pretend to draw a complex reality like the Chinese one of the 80s. These are small personal experiences that have a value only for the writer). 

The 1980s were those of China's awakening, thanks to Deng Xiaoping, the "little helmsman" who had denounced the mistakes of his predecessor and planned the reform of the socialist system. 

_

______________________________________________ 

I worked in the Societa' Metallurgica Italiana leader of non-ferrous metals in Europe. SMI sold kilometers of Lega 10 to the Chinese (a copper-clad steel cable for telephone lines to replace the very expensive copper one).

The Chinese were excellent payers and were opening up to the Western world by soliciting numerous economic missions to their country. 

The president of my company, Luigi Orlando, was vice president for years of Confindustria (the main association representing manufacturing and service companies in Italy) and your editor had become his assistant after moving from Florence to Rome to manage the Group's registered company. 

_____________________________________________________ 

Confindustria delegation with numerous journalists in tow. 

Arrival in Canton. 

A nice colleague of the Mattino di Napoli who was a heavy smoker rushes out of the airport, starts smoking like a madman and throws his butts on the ground. 

Two policemen, a man and a woman, jump on him, handcuff him and take him away. We had to call the Italian embassy in Beijing to be able to free our travel companion.

 

_____________________________________________________ 

 Jogging in Canton. 

As soon as I arrived at the hotel after so many hours on the plane, it was not a good idea to go to bed. A run of a few kilometers would surely have reconciled me with the different time zone and made me dispose of the toxins. 


I wear a pair of shorts and a brightly colored jersey shirt, tennis shoes with reinforced and sprung soles. 

I go out through the central door of the hotel and take a left. I am convinced that I will be able to go around the block back to the origin. 

Among my many talents I also have that of not having the slightest sense of direction. 

In fact, I no longer know how to return to the hotel. Panic grows and I decide to ask for information.

_______________________________________________________

I found myself in a miserable neighborhood with streets dotted with quilts from beds set to dry. People look at me curious and surprised. They are all dressed in black, blue, dark gray. 

 

A woman comes towards me holding an open box with something to sell. "Hotel, hotel ..." I mumble the name of the hotel in my own way. 

The woman looks at me in fear and begins to scream. Better to resume the race hoping to recover some indication to return to the hotel. 

The street ends in a large square where other streets converge. In the middle of the square there is a pedestal with a policeman on it who operates the traffic light. 

 

In the square and in the adjacent streets an incredible mass of people on bicycles, trucks, buses, tractors. Cyclists ring the bell all the time, truck drivers are attached to the horn, the general noise is frightening. 

 

The pizzardone (policeman) somehow tries in the midst of all that din to regulate the traffic from the streets to the square and vice versa. 

I just have to keep running and head towards the podium on which the policeman is glued. I arrive under the ladder and as soon as the soldier realizes the Martian who is asking him with strange gestures something, he thinks rightly to block the red light. 

 

The din of bells and horns suddenly fell silent. People wave out of the bus windows, cyclists observe the scene with extreme interest as I persistently try to break through the pizzardone's mind to get some indication. 

At a certain moment I see a hint of intelligence in the eyes of the policeman. He pronounces the name of the hotel correctly in his own way and I nod yes that it is exactly where I would like to return. 

In the midst of the unnatural silence of the paralyzed traffic, the pizzardone descends the ladder and approaches me. 

 "What are you doing now?" I ask myself alarmed, "You won't want to handcuff me ?!" 

He takes me by the hand and leads me in front of one of the great streets that converge in the square, indicates that I must go in that direction and then, manifestation of the highest indulgence towards a stupid western foreigner, knocks on my hand three times indicating the turn in the third street on the left. 

My run starts again according to his instructions, the policeman has taken up its place on the pedestal, reactivating the traffic light and starting again the traffic currents and the general noise. 

 Oscar 

(keep it going)

Se Polonia e Ungheria non la piantano, rischiano di restare fuori dal Recovery Plan


Next Generation Eu: l’accordo obbligato per riunificare l’Europa

Articolo di Romano Prodi su Il Messaggero del 29 novembre 2020

Il braccio di ferro tra Polonia e Ungheria con le Istituzioni europee e gli altri 25 governi, sta andando avanti senza ancora una soluzione. Al di là dei complicati aspetti tecnici, i termini del conflitto sono molto semplici.

Come tutti sappiamo, a partire dalla scorsa estate, è stato apprestato dalla Commissione (e poi adottato dal Consiglio Europeo) un progetto politico chiamato Next Generation EU: un’iniziativa dedicata ad aiutare i paesi europei pesantemente provati dal Covid-19. Il progetto, fin dall’inizio, prevedeva che ne potessero beneficiare solo i paesi che si impegnavano ad applicare i principi fondamentali della democrazia. Si trattava di una condizione sostanzialmente scontata, in quanto non faceva che ribadire le regole che stanno alla base dell’Unione Europea. Condizione così scontata da essere accettata da tutti i paesi aderenti, Polonia e Ungheria compresi.

Nello stesso tempo, in modo sempre più clamoroso, i governi di questi due paesi hanno però messo in atto misure interne in contrasto con alcuni dei principi fondamentali dell’Unione. Si tratta soprattutto della libertà dei media, dell’indipendenza della magistratura e di altri fondamentali diritti dei cittadini.

Il Parlamento di Strasburgo ha reagito ribadendo con larghissima maggioranza, e in termini inequivocabili, che il rispetto dei diritti fondamentali della democrazia doveva essere una condizione concreta e assoluta per l’erogazione dei fondi del Next Generation EU. La reazione dei governi di Polonia e Ungheria non si è fatta attendere e si è espressa ribadendo che ogni paese è sovrano nello stabilire le regole della propria convivenza interna, aggiungendo che la decisione europea non si fondava su elementi di diritto, ma solo su prese di posizioni discriminatorie nei loro confronti.

Queste affermazioni di principio sono state rese esplosive da un’azione concreta dei due paesi, volta a bloccare l’intero funzionamento del Next Generation EU. Questo è possibile perché l’approvazione del bilancio europeo, che contribuisce alla raccolta delle risorse necessarie per mettere in atto il progetto, esige un voto unanime da parte di tutti i paesi membri. Il debito pubblico, generato dalla nuova politica di solidarietà, deve essere infatti accompagnato da un aumento della dotazione del bilancio europeo.

La Commissione, di conseguenza, ha proposto un aumento delle risorse del bilancio comunitario dall’1,2% al 2% del Prodotto Lordo Europeo. Tutto questo esige non solo l’approvazione unanime del Consiglio Europeo, ma anche il voto positivo sia del Parlamento Europeo che di tutti i parlamenti nazionali. Nonostante l’impossibilità di superare queste prove, Polonia e Ungheria hanno dichiarato di valersi del diritto di veto in loro possesso.

Come risposta il Parlamento Europeo, a maggioranza schiacciante, ha ribadito che l’appartenenza all’Unione non si fonda su pur comprensibili interessi economici, ma trova la sua ragione d’essere nella comune accettazione delle regole democratiche.

Ancora fermo su queste posizioni, lo scontro sta andando avanti senza concrete prospettive di mediazione: la grande operazione di solidarietà creata per uscire dalla crisi e riprendere la crescita è quindi formalmente bloccata. A questo punto occorre considerare che tra i maggiori beneficiari del progetto europeo troviamo proprio Polonia e Ungheria che si trovano in grave difficoltà economica e possono sperare di uscirne solo se aiutati dall’Unione che, tuttavia, senza approvazione del bilancio, non può affrontare nuove spese.

La tensione è arrivata ad un punto tale che è stata addirittura autorevolmente avanzata la proposta di escludere Polonia e Ungheria dal Next Generation EU, che dovrebbe essere quindi portato avanti, con una decisione intergovernativa, dagli altri 25 paesi.

Si tratta ovviamente di una proposta estrema, alla quale la Cancelliera tedesca fortemente si oppone. Questo non tanto per evitare il rischio di una nuova Brexit, che i due paesi non sono in grado di mettere in atto, quanto per non creare una tensione certamente dannosa per l’Unione e, per di più, con due paesi così strettamente legati alla Germania.

L’unica possibile via d’uscita deriva dal fatto che, come è ben noto, tutte le grandi prese di posizione in politica estera nascono dalla politica interna. Nonostante le dichiarazioni roboanti dei loro leader, le opinioni pubbliche di Polonia e Ungheria cominciano a dimostrare qualche perplessità su un confronto sempre più difficile da vincere. Inoltre i politici oltranzisti, come il Ministro della Giustizia polacco, si trovano di fronte alla prospettiva di un futuro peggiore dato che, per entrambi i paesi, non vi è alternativa all’Europa.

Resta inoltre sempre valida la considerazione che, quando la realtà delle cose comincia a farsi valere, si trovano accettabili modalità di applicazione anche nelle questioni di principio. Penso quindi che, nella prossima riunione del Consiglio Europeo, si giungerà al necessario accordo, purché si tenga sempre fermo il fatto che, mantenendo il principio dell’unanimità, non solo non si governa l’Europa, ma non si gestisce nemmeno un condominio.

E se ci provasse...?

 

Donald Trump ha ora una sola e grande preoccupazione personale: quella di non farsi incastrare dal Eastern District of New York presso il quale sono accese indagini che riguardano accuse e denunce di stupro, bancarotta, relazioni con potenze straniere e via citando.

Al momento ha dato inizio ad una campagna di perdoni cominciando dal discusso generale Michael Flyin sul quale pendeva la condanna a sette anni di reclusione per avere negato all'FBI i suoi contatti con esponenti russi e la sua posizione quale agente del governo turco nonostante ricoprisse l'alto incarico di consulente per il presidente della sicurezza nazionale.

Perdonare la cricca di yes men condannati ma incapace di perdonare se stesso.

Sta circolando in questi giorni a Washington l'ipotesi che Donald Trump pensi ad utilizzare il 25º emendamento della Costituzione americana specificamente per quanto riguarda la sezione numero tre che recita: 

Section 3. Whenever the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that he is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, and until he transmits to them a written declaration to the contrary, such powers and duties shall be discharged by the Vice President as Acting President.

L'ipotesi è che, adducendo complicazioni determinate dalla somministrazione delle potenti medicine che gli hanno consentito di contrastare il coronavirus 19, Trump, il presidente ancora in carica, possa dichiarare di non essere in grado di adempiere correttamente alle sue funzioni per un limitato periodo di tempo.

A questo punto la gestione della presidenza, sia pure in zona Cesarini, passerebbe in toto al vicepresidente Pence, il quale potrebbe nell'ambito delle sue nuove prerogative emettere un perdono assolutorio nella persona di Donald Trump, liberandolo del peso incombente delle cause aperte nei suoi confronti.

Qualcuno potrà obiettare che si tratta di un percorso costituzionale assolutamente irreale.

Il fatto che se ne parli assiduamente nei corridoi del Congresso sta a dimostrare che potrebbe trattarsi di una realistica ipotesi di lavoro.

Resta infine da dire che Donald Trump non sparirà dal palcoscenico politico americano nel breve termine. 

Avendo praticamente eliminato ogni centralità tradizionale del vecchio partito repubblicano come un ragno agisce nei confronti della mosca ingabbiata nella sua rete, gli esponenti di mezza età del GOP si faranno un punto di impegno nel riconoscere a questo personaggio la primazia politica del fu partito repubblicano. Pur di garantirsi un futuro di riconferma alla Camera o al Senato.

Donald Trump continuerà ad agitare il pacchetto di oltre 74 milioni di voti ottenuti alle elezioni presidenziali del 3 novembre 2020  creando intralci e ostacoli sulla strada del presidente eletto Joe Biden.

Oscar 

_________________________________________________

Purtroppo mi pare ipotesi da non trascurare
Roberto P.

_________________________________________________ 

Questa e' la faccia.di un arrogante.pirla
Speriamo che il partito dei conservatori non lo presenti alle prossime.elezioni e che paghi per tutte le furberie.compiute.Uomo.sul.quale grava.amche il.reato di strage di massa oltre tanti altri di tipo fiscale.Questo impresentabile sara' la rovina del partito.Repubblicano americano

Trump at last says he'll leave......

Trump at last says he'll leave the White House if the Electoral College seats Biden

 

President Donald Trump finally said that he will leave the White House if the Electoral College formalizes President-elect Joe Biden’s victory even as he insisted such a decision would be a “mistake."

 

Trump spent his Thanksgiving renewing baseless claims that “massive fraud” and crooked officials in battleground states caused his election defeat even though there is no evidence to support his claims.

 

The fact that a sitting American president even had to address whether or not he would leave office after losing reelection underscores the extent to which Trump has smashed democratic conventions and undermined the process over the past three weeks, Jill Colvin reports.

 

VIDEO: Trump says he'll go if he loses Electoral College. 

 

Zombie Election: Monday seemed like the end of Trump's relentless challenges to the election, after the federal government acknowledged Biden was the “apparent winner” and Trump cleared the way for cooperation on a transition of power. But his baseless claims have a way of coming back. And back. And back. Colleen Long, Alanna Durkin Richer and Zeke Miller report.

 

Despite dozens of legal and procedural setbacks, his campaign keeps filing new challenges that have no hope of succeeding and making fresh, unfounded claims of fraud. But that’s the point. Trump’s strategy wasn’t to change the outcome, but to create a host of phantom claims that would infect the nation with doubt, even though the winner was clear and there has been no evidence of mass voter fraud.

 

“Zombies are dead people walking among the living — this litigation is the same thing,” says a professor at the University of Southern California Gould School of Law. “In terms of litigation that could change the election, all these cases are basically dead men walking.”

Stanno licenziando Topolino



 Mickey Mouse



Alberto Pasolini Zanelli

Stanno licenziando Topolino. Gradualmente e attraverso i suoi creatori. Lo ha annunciato la Disney, che direttamente ha mandato in pensione anche l’ombra amata del suo fondatore, Walt. Attraverso diverse di migliaia di impiegati della “multinazionale” che porta il suo nome e deve la sua gloria a questo spiritoso animaletto. È una notizia che potrebbe far sorridere, ma genera invece tristezza. Con Mickey Mouse rischia così di spegnersi una delle figure d’America più diffuse e popolari nel mondo intero. Ininterrottamente un volto e una gloria del ventesimo secolo, coinvolto anche nella Seconda guerra mondiale, allorché i Paesi dell’Asse, Italia e Germania, l’avevano soppresso o almeno “incarcerato”: non lo avremmo importato più fino alla sconfitta.

Anche questa volta le forbici della censura segnalano una sconfitta, questa volta anche e soprattutto americana. Il nemico è troppo potente e, fino adesso, invincibile. Tutta l’America (e in tanti altri Paesi del pianeta) deve difendersi dal virus anche, soprattutto, stringendo i cordoni della borsa, ricorrendo ai licenziamenti. Ma sono i licenziati poi che rimangono senza dollari, che devono ricorrere, di conseguenza, ai risparmi. Chiudono i negozi in tutte le città degli Stati Uniti. Si comprano meno bistecche e quindi meno giocattoli. Inoltre i due eroi di Disney (Topolino e Paperino) sono nati di carta e hanno dovuto sacrificarsi per sopravvivere all’ondata dell’epoca dei giochi elettronici.

Alla Disney hanno aspettato un po’ di più degli altri prima di firmare un documento di resa. Forse è solo un armistizio, ma pochi ci credono. Per ora, passato il Capodanno, manderanno a casa 32mila collaboratori (su un totale di oltre 223mila a fine 2019, più del 10 per cento della forza lavoro), 4mila in più rispetto alla cifra preannunciata a fine settembre, come conseguenza di un crollo del fatturato, rispetto allo stesso periodo dell’anno scorso, di circa l’85 per cento. Adulti senza lavoro, bambini senza un caro giocattolo di carta. Peggio ancora, hanno già cominciato a rinunciare anche ai parchi, ai loro ingressi in cui Topolino li accoglieva e li guidava a visitare Disneyland. Già li hanno più o meno esclusi dalle scuole, radici dello sviluppo culturale oltre che dei paradisi della fantasia. I bambini come gli adulti: sono rari ormai gli annunci sonori della chiusura di fabbriche e negozi. Pare che sia una triste necessità, cui resistono soprattutto gli uomini politici, gli amministratori, coloro i quali hanno il dovere di nutrire gli altri adulti e consolarle i piccoli. Il più illustre e autorevole è il governatore dello Stato di New York, l’italoamericano Andrew Mark Cuomo, che ha trovato una formula quasi irresistibile, narrando che la sua vecchia mamma “è malata e ha bisogno di guarire in tempo”.

È passato già molto tempo da quando l’America e il mondo sono stati costretti a creare una parola relativamente nuova: Coronavirus. Molte aziende, pur di non licenziare, hanno fatto un ricorso massiccio allo smart working. Ma Topolino, a Orlando, non può farlo. Altre si danno da fare e ultimamente hanno fatto giungere qualche buona notizia: l’“invenzione” di cure inedite, alcune riparatorie, altre preventive. Sono queste ultime a suscitare le massime speranze e dunque il più caldo applauso. Ma non sono tutte perfette e la fretta non sempre aiuta. Una di quelle più promettenti, nata in America, aveva appena annunciato di essere riuscita ad accorciare in grande misura i tempi per la produzione del vaccino. Si trattava di un errore dovuto, hanno ammesso, ad una “distrazione”. La Disney non ha questa colpa, ma anche così Topolino sta dicendo addio alle passeggiate dei suoi fans, bambini e adulti. O, nella più incoraggiante delle ipotesi, a sospenderle.

Pasolini.zanelli@gmail.com

Supreme Court relieves religious organizations from some covid-related restrictions - Una decisione gravissima



 

Una decisione gravissima ed un successo 'postumo' per Trump che ha fatto della Suprema Corte una sua longa manus di destra.

Il Governatore Cuomo non vuole interferire con la liberta' di culto, ma con il pericolo di aggravamento dei contagi determinato da assembramenti, comunque denominati.

La settimana scorsa gli ebrei ortodossi di New York in settemila hanno partecipato ad un matrimonio religioso.

 

Questi cosiddetti ' fedeli' non si limitano a vivere nei loro ambienti socio-religiosi ma vanno in cotatto con gli altri segmenti della societa' portando al massimo livello le possibilita' di contagio.

Il Dio della varie religioni e' gia' impegnato con le preghiere dei malati terminali di Corona Virus 19, senza che si muova anche la Suprema Corte .

__________________________________________________________


By
Robert Barnes (twp)
November 26, 2020
The Supreme Court’s new conservative majority late Wednesday night sided with religious organizations in New York that said they were illegally targeted by pandemic-related restrictions imposed by Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo to combat spiking coronavirus cases.
The 5-to-4 order was the first show of solidified conservative strength on the court since the confirmation of Justice Amy Coney Barrett, whom President Trump chose to replace liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg following her death in September. The decision differed from the court’s previous practice of deferring to local officials on pandemic-related restrictions, even in the area of constitutionally protected religious rights.
“Even in a pandemic, the Constitution cannot be put away and forgotten,” said the unsigned opinion granting a stay of the state’s orders. “The restrictions at issue here, by effectively barring many from attending religious services, strike at the very heart of the First Amendment’s guarantee of religious liberty.”
The limits were severe, at times capping worship services at only 10 people. But the state said they were necessary to deal with “hot spots” of virus outbreaks.
The Supreme Court’s order was issued just before midnight, and five justices wrote separately.
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., who had been the court’s pivotal member in previous emergency applications seeking relief from virus-related restrictions, dissented along with the court’s three liberal members.
He noted that while the court was considering the petitions, Cuomo, a Democrat, had eased the restrictions, and thus there was no need for the court to intervene now.
“It is a significant matter to override determinations made by public health officials concerning what is necessary for public safety in the midst of a deadly pandemic,” Roberts wrote for himself.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor said the court was intervening where it should not.
“The Constitution does not forbid States from responding to public health crises through regulations that treat religious institutions equally or more favorably than comparable secular institutions, particularly when those regulations save lives,” she wrote, adding, “Justices of this court play a deadly game in second guessing the expert judgment of health officials about the environments in which a contagious virus, now infecting a million Americans each week, spreads most easily.”
Supreme Court, in rare late-night ruling, says California may enforce certain restrictions on religious gatherings
The issue has divided the court before.
In past cases, Roberts agreed with conservative justices who turned down petitions from prisoners seeking intervention, allowing local corrections officials to set the rules for dealing with the virus.
But Roberts sided with the liberals, when Ginsburg was alive, to leave in place restrictions in California and Nevada that imposed strict limits on in-person services at houses of worship.
In the California case, Roberts wrote that fast-changing conditions meant the courts should defer to local officials charged with protecting the public. They “should not be subject to second-guessing by an unelected federal judiciary, which lacks the background, competence and expertise to assess public health and is not accountable to the people,” he wrote.
But the court’s more conservative justices said it violated the Constitution for local officials to impose more drastic restrictions on houses of worship than on businesses considered essential.
In a speech to the conservative Federalist Society earlier this month, Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. amplified his objections, saying the pandemic “has resulted in previously unimaginable restrictions on individual liberty.”
He continued: “This is especially evident with respect to religious liberty. It pains me to say this, but in certain quarters, religious liberty is fast becoming a disfavored right.”
Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, another Trump appointee to the court, took pointed aim at Roberts’s opinion in the California case and declared that it should no longer guide lower courts when weighing pandemic-related restrictions on religious services.
“Courts must resume applying the Free Exercise Clause,” Gorsuch wrote. “Today, a majority of the Court makes this plain.”
He said the order should dispel “misconceptions about the role of the Constitution in times of crisis, which have already been permitted to persist for too long.”
The Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn and Jewish organizations led by Agudath Israel challenged Cuomo’s system of imposing drastic restrictions on certain neighborhoods when coronavirus cases spike.
Under Cuomo’s plan, in areas designated “red zones,” where the virus risk is highest, worship services are capped at 10 people. At the next level, “orange zones,” there is an attendance cap of 25. The size of the facility does not factor into the capacity limit.
The diocese said in its petition that the plan subjects “houses of worship alone” to “onerous fixed-capacity caps while permitting a host of secular businesses to remain open in ‘red’ and ‘orange’ zones without any restrictions whatsoever.”
“The result is that Target and Staples can host hundreds of shoppers at a time, and brokers can spend 40 hours per week working and hosting customers in poorly ventilated office buildings, but Catholics cannot attend a 45-minute Mass,” the petition said.
Cuomo said in announcing the restrictions that failure by some Orthodox Jewish groups to abide by lesser restrictions turned the surrounding neighborhoods into “hot spots,” where temporary drastic measures were needed.
Agudath Israel, which describes itself as an “umbrella organization for Orthodox Jewry,” said Cuomo’s words show why the restrictions are unconstitutional.
“This case is the first time in living memory where a state governor has drawn targets on a map over neighborhoods of a discrete religious minority” to allay “the majority’s ‘fears’ that this minority was deepening a national crisis,” the group said in its petition to the Supreme Court.
“This court should not permit such remarkable scapegoating of a religious minority to stand.”
New York responded that the restrictions are temporary and changing based on conditions. When coronavirus cases spike, the restrictions are put in place, and then removed when conditions improve.
For instance, the state said the designations had been changed since the organizations filed petitions with the Supreme Court.
“At this time, there are no red or orange zones in Brooklyn or in Queens — or indeed anywhere in New York City — only yellow zones,” the state said in its response. None of the churches or synagogues face the toughest restrictions.
And the restrictions are lessened for houses of worship in other zones. In the next level, “yellow zones,” nonessential gatherings are limited to 25 people, but houses of worship are restricted to 50 percent of capacity — more than what the diocese even requested.
Actually, the state argued, it has opted to treat religion more favorably.
“Rather than prohibit houses of worship located in red and orange zones from hosting gatherings altogether, [Cuomo’s order] allows such gatherings to occur, subject to limits on their size,” the brief said.
“The order thus accords preferential treatment to religious gatherings in houses of worship, as compared with secular activities that present a similar or greater degree of risk of COVID-19 spread.”
Lower courts sided with the state, denying the emergency relief sought by the religious groups.
The cases are Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. Cuomo and Agudath Israel v. Cuomo.

_______________________________________________________

 Grave e, potenzialmente, un boomerang per le minoranze religiose stesse.

Infatti, per il principio che la tua libertà finisce dove comincia la mia, la libertà di essere infetti, garantita da questa sentenza, autorizza anche i non appartenenti a queste minoranze a rifiutare servizio a questi "untori religiosi". Triste vedere come dalla peste di Milano, di manzoniana memoria, ad oggi gli oltranzismi religiosi non abbiano fatto progressi.
Ciao
Clark
_________________________________________________________

After Trump, what’s next for the West’s far right?




A worker puts up an advertising billboard for a recruiting company, featuring a character who resembles President Trump, in Zagreb, Croatia, on Nov. 7. (Darko Bandic/AP)


When it became clear that President Trump had lost the election, another Donald started celebrating. “Trump’s defeat can be the beginning of the end of the triumph of far-right populisms also in Europe,” tweeted Donald Tusk, former president of the European Council.

The Polish politician is a vocal critic of both the brand of illiberal nationalism that has taken over his native country as well as Trump’s “America First” agenda. In the first weeks of Trump’s presidency, he described Trump’s avowed politics as constituting a possible “external” threat to the European Union. In the years that followed, the right-wing government in Warsaw cozied up to the White House, hosting a Trump visit and later an ineffectual Trump administration summit on the future of the Middle East. Polish state television has recently recycled falsehoods supported by Trump of voter fraud in the wake of the U.S. election.

With President-elect Joe Biden poised to enter the White House in January, Europe’s nationalists and populists look lonelier. It’s a stark contrast to the first months of the Trump presidency, when his ideological allies in Europe cheered what they claimed was a turning point in history. “We are experiencing the end of one world and the birth of another,” trumpeted French far-right leader Marine Le Pen in January 2017. “We are experiencing the return of nation-states.”

The following year, former Trump adviser Stephen K. Bannon barnstormed through Europe with grandiose plans to knit together a transnational right wing in Europe and North America. He hailed Hungary’s nationalist Prime Minister Viktor Orban as a “hero,” a “patriot” and an inspiration for Western politics. “What I’ve learned is that you’re part of a worldwide movement that is bigger than France, bigger than Italy, bigger than Hungary — bigger than all of it. And history is on our side,” Bannon told a crowd in the French city of Lille. “The tide of history is on our side.”

But that nationalist tide is now ebbing. Bannon’s movement fizzled. The European far right has been mostly checked over a series of national elections, as well as the 2019 European Parliament elections. Rather than bellwethers for the future, Orban and his Polish counterparts seem like continental outliers at risk of turning into pariahs. Farther west, far-right parties are fanning conspiracy theories about the pandemic, while also joining the ranks of the Trumpist bitter-enders who refused to accept Biden’s electoral victory.

When asked last week if she would recognize Biden as the next U.S. president, Le Pen said “absolutely not” until all of Trump’s legal challenges are exhausted. She and her far-right National Rally party have to wait until 2022 to challenge for the French presidency, but nationalist movements are hardly any closer to political dominance in the West than they were when Trump first came to office.


President Trump welcomes Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban to the White House in Washington on May 13. (Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP)

Instead, observers expect Biden’s ascent to power to bolster liberal, internationalist forces across the Atlantic. The European Union is turning the screws right now on the governments of Hungary and Poland for their controversial attacks on democratic institutions within their countries. A Biden White House more supportive of Brussels may make that pressure all the more effective.

“What has really changed is that liberal powers now feel empowered,” Kati Piri, a Hungarian-born member of the European Parliament who represents the Netherlands, told the Wall Street Journal. “For the last several years many European leaders didn’t stand up to these autocrats. Now I have the feeling that this won’t happen again.”

“With Trump gone, populist politicians will not only enjoy less domestic legitimacy; governments will face a higher international price for nationalist stances,” wrote Philippe Legrain, a former economic adviser to the president of the European Commission.

“It’s going to be a pretty big change,” Ivo Daalder, a former U.S. ambassador to NATO, told the Wall Street Journal. “Democratic values and the commitment to the rule of law are going to be pretty darn fundamental to having good relations with Washington.”

But the far-right wave that included Trump is not about to vanish. In the United States, the Republican Party is still largely beholden to Trumpist politics, while a new generation of GOP officials seeks to build a more durable platform that may see the traditionally laissez-faire party start to borrow more directly from the economic populism of Europe’s far right. In Europe, centrist politicians and parties have tried to head off the populist challenge by aping far-right talking points on immigration and Islam.

Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, now perhaps the most prominent nationalist in the Western hemisphere, is going to be at loggerheads with the Biden administration over climate policy. But for all his aversion to scientific expertise, Bolsonaro’s popularity remains high. Experts recognize that the opponents of nationalism have to represent more than just a return to liberal norms and niceties.

That’s true in the United States and elsewhere. “All of the social and economic problems that led to the rise of Trump and Bolsonaro, these problems are still here,” Maurício Santoro, a political scientist at the State University of Rio de Janeiro, told my colleagues. “The political system hasn’t reformed itself. We’re talking about a long-form battle over the reform of political systems.”

“What this election demonstrates is that in the same way Trumpism is alive and kicking in the U.S., our own little Trumps are still alive and kicking,” Nathalie Tocci, director of the Rome-based Institute of International Affairs think tank, told the Financial Times. “The only guarantee we have that they [won’t] rise again is addressing the grievances and inequalities the pandemic is going to aggravate even further.”

'A republic, if you can keep it'

 

Stephen Collinson and Caitlin Hu

CNN


----------

Donald Trump’s second-term fantasy just fizzled.

 

The killer blow to Trump’s tumultuous presidency came late Monday afternoon, when a previously obscure US government official, Emily Murphy, finally triggered the official presidential transition – nearly three weeks after Joe Biden won the election. Meanwhile, the outgoing President's ridiculous legal challenges are crumbling, key states keep certifying his election defeat and Biden started naming his Cabinet.

 

The transition unleashes millions of dollars in funds for the President-elect to prepare for power and compels the current administration to brief the incoming team. That doesn't necessarily mean Trump himself will cooperate with the transition, though. In a face-saving tweet, the President insisted that it was he who had ordered Murphy to begin the transfer of power -- but his remaining two months in office leave him plenty of time to try to sabotage Biden’s administration.


We may never get a formal concession from Trump, who's likely to walk out of the Oval Office in January still insisting the election was stolen. But the bedrock of American democracy appears to have narrowly survived him. Asked in 1787 what kind of government the United States had, Founding Father Benjamin Franklin reputedly responded, “A republic, if you can keep it.” This year, the state and local officials and judges who rejected Trump’s attempts to invalidate millions of votes did just that.

 

AstraZeneca vaccine up to 90% effective and easily transportable, company says


FILE - In this Thursday, April 23, 2020 file screen grab taken from video issued by Britain&amp;#39;s Oxford University, showing a person being injected as part of the first human trials in the UK to test a potential coronavirus vaccine, untaken by Oxford University in England. AstraZeneca says late-stage trials of its COVID-19 vaccine were “highly effective’’ in preventing disease. A vaccine developed by AstraZeneca and the University of Oxford prevented 70% of people from developing the coronavirus in late-stage trials, the team reported Monday Nov. 23, 2020. (Oxford University Pool via AP, File)

By
William Booth and
Antonia Noori Farzan (TWP)

LONDON — AstraZeneca on Monday became the third pharmaceutical company to announce promising results from late-stage trials of a coronavirus vaccine, saying that its candidate, developed by Oxford University, is up to 90 percent effective.
That would make it somewhat less protective than vaccines by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna, which each reported 95 percent effectiveness. But the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine may be a more realistic option for more of the world, as it is likely to be cheaper and does not need to be stored at subzero temperatures.
The Oxford-AstraZeneca team said in a video conference with journalists that their candidate’s average efficacy was 70 percent, reflecting the disparate results from two different dosing regimens. When two full doses were given at least one month apart, efficacy was at 62 percent. But it rose to 90 percent when a subject received only a half-dose, followed with a full dose one month later.Andrew Pollard, chief investigator of the Oxford trial, said the findings showed that the vaccine would save many lives.
“Excitingly, we’ve found that one of our dosing regimens may be around 90 percent effective, and if this dosing regimen is used, more people could be vaccinated with planned vaccine supply,” he said.
Sarah Gilbert, a lead Oxford researcher, cautioned that this one-two punch would have to be more closely studied to be fully understood. But she said the first half-dose might be priming a person’s immune system just enough, and that the second booster then encourages the body to produce a robust defense against sickness and infection.
Shares in AstraZeneca slipped nearly 3 percent on the London stock exchange by mid-afternoon.
The United States has preordered 300 million doses of the vaccine. Britain has ordered 100 million.
AstraZeneca executives said the vaccine is already being manufactured. The first 4 million doses could be ready in December, and 40 million could be delivered in the first quarter of 2021, they said. By the spring, the company and its global partners in India, Brazil, Russia and the United States could be cranking out 100 million to 200 million doses a month.
AstraZeneca and Oxford have been conducting Phase 3 clinical trials worldwide, with the most recent data coming from an interim analysis based on 131 coronavirus infections in Britain and Brazil among 10,000 volunteers, with half getting the vaccine and half getting a placebo.
No participants who received the vaccine developed severe cases or required hospitalization, AstraZeneca said Monday. The drugmaker also said that no “serious safety events” were reported in connection with the vaccine, which was typically “well tolerated” by participants regardless of their dosing levels or ages.
While the results released by AstraZeneca indicate somewhat lower efficacy than Pfizer and Moderna, the vaccine can be stored and transported at normal refrigerated conditions for up to six months. That could make it significantly easier to roll out than Pfizer’s vaccine, which has to be stored at minus-70 degrees Celsius, or Moderna’s, which is stable in refrigerated conditions for only 30 days and must be frozen at minus-20 degrees Celsius after that.
Matt Hancock, Britain’s health secretary, said the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine announcement was great news.
“I am really very pleased. I really welcome these figures, this data, which shows that the vaccine in the right dosage can be up to 90 percent effective,” Hancock told Sky News.
Hancock said the British government has already ordered 100 million doses of the vaccine, “and should all that go well, the bulk of the rollout will be in the new year.”
AstraZeneca said it would present the results to Britain’s health-care products regulators immediately. Company executives said they would quickly seek approval to fine-tune their clinical trials in the United States, to experiment with giving volunteers there a first half-dose followed by a booster, which produced the 90 percent efficacy in Britain and Brazil.
The Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine was first developed in a small laboratory running on a shoestring budget by Gilbert at Oxford and her team. The university kicked in 1 million pounds ($1.3 million) and then sought a manufacturing partner, before settling on AstraZeneca.
“We wanted to ensure there wouldn’t be any profiteering off the pandemic,” said Louise Richardson, the university’s vice chancellor, so that their vaccine would be widely distributed “and wouldn’t just be for the wealthy and the first world.”
The scientists said that although it appeared to be a race, or a competition, among the front-running vaccine developers, no one company could produce by itself the millions of doses needed to end the pandemic.
“We don’t have enough supply for the whole planet,” Pollard said, adding that the important message is that today there are at least three highly effective, safe vaccines, that also appear to work well among the elderly, and that they are produced using different technologies, ensuring the quickest route to manufacture the billions of doses that will be necessary.
Pollard said it is “unclear why” the different vaccines were producing different results, and he said he and the scientific community awaited full data sets from all the clinical trials to fully understand what is going on. He said different studies were also using different end points to describe efficacy.
“At this moment we can’t fully explain the differences,” Pollard said. “It’s critical to understand what everyone is measuring.”
Peter Piot, director of the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, who was instrumental in the battle against AIDS, said the importance of the announcements about the three vaccine candidates cannot be overestimated.
“The only way to stop covid-19 in its tracks is having multiple effective and safe vaccines that can be deployed all around the world and in vast quantities,” Piot said.

Us and Death foretold


 

Do you remember the shock when you learned of an aviation disaster? 

For a few hours we felt full of anguish watching the recovery of the remains of passengers at the crash site on television, unless it was possible. 

They were "a few hundred" of corpses. But the scythe of death surprised and pained us even when the number of dead was limited but it referred to some basketball star, just to give an example, and to his daughter. 

The cry of the media mourners was planetary. 

Not today. Not today. 

In Italy there is talk of over 600 deaths a day and here in the United States the second pandemic wave now stands at 2000 people who died in 24 hours. 

The 260,000 American deaths from the virus are the equivalent of three wars fought by the United States, two of which were World Wars. 

Not today: the repetitiveness of negative information has created a stable addiction whereby those who die lie and those who are still alive give themselves peace. 

The same feeling as when we drive over the remains of a cat. 

In the long run, all do-goodism proves to be a daily counterfeiting of feelings. 

Many are only interested in what concerns their exclusive personal bubble. 

The pain of others is written, learned ruminations are made, images of dying patients and relatives excluded from hospitals are shown. 

But it is hot air because what matters is that we and our closest family members feel good. 

He says: but how do you put it with volunteers who work hours unloading crates and feeding people who no longer have to eat? 

He says: but how do you put it with the paramedics, the doctors continuously exposed to the infection and many of them lose their lives? (Without taking into account the professional haters who on social media accuse them of being among the few categories that still receive a salary in the face of generalized and growing unemployment).

There are the invocations of scientists, experts, politicians, people of common sense who invite them to use the mask permanently, keep a safe distance, wash their hands frequently, avoid any contact with others. 

But obviously they are of little use because it is enough to consider the images of the gates in the airports in these days before Thanks Giving Day to realize that the appeal not to travel, not to contribute to the spread of the infection for the sake of maintaining a family tradition which often no longer makes sense due to the destruction of families, is falling on deaf ears. 

Of course it is nice to be able to hug parents and grandparents again at least once a year showing their children and grandchildren. 

As for the possibility that precisely those elderly people could be infected by the apparent manifestations of formal affection of the young....... "why does it have to happen to us?"

Moreover, the fact that the virus is skimming most of the world's societies by decimating the elderly triggers the thought (which must not be externalized) of: "Better them than me ... And then they are resources that are left available to other generations ..." 

 Cruel claims? Try asking yourself these questions in the secrecy of your conscience. 

The pandemic, every epidemic, not only trigger feelings of love but also bring out the narrow-mindedness of the survival instinct, what is generally defined as the "Spirit of the Medusa Raft" (remember that story of cannibalism among the survivors of a shipwreck?). 

Very crude statements tells us an Italian friend during a Whatsapp conversation. 

We realize that it is unbearable the façade of do-gooding thrown in by the media to make people open their wallets. 

 Oscar

Noi e la Morte annunciata


 

Vi ricordate lo sgomento quando si apprendeva di un disastro aeronautico 

Per qualche ora ci sentivamo pieni d'angoscia seguendo in televisione le operazioni di recupero dei resti dei passeggeri nel luogo dell'impatto, sempre che fosse possibile. 

Erano "poche centinaia" di cadaveri. 

Ma la falce della morte ci  stupiva e addolorava anche quando il numero dei morti era limitato ma si riferiva a qualche stella del basket, tanto per fare un esempio, e alla sua figlia. 

Il pianto delle prefiche mediatiche era planetario.  

Oggi no. Oggi no. 

In Italia si parla di oltre 600 morti al giorno e qui negli Stati Uniti la seconda ondata pandemica si attesta ormai sulle 2000 persone decedute nelle 24 ore. 

I 260.000 morti americani per il virus sono l'equivalente di tre guerre combattute dagli Stati Uniti di cui due mondiali. 

Oggi no: la ripetitività delle informazioni negative ha creato una stabile assuefazione per cui chi muore giace e chi è vivo ancora si pace. 

La stessa sensazione di quando passiamo con la macchina sopra i resti di un gatto

Tutto il buonismo alla lunga si dimostra una quotidiana contraffazione di sentimenti. 

A tanti interessa solo quello che riguarda la loro esclusiva bolla personale. Del dolore degli altri si scrive, si fanno dotte elucubrazioni, si mostrano le immagini dei pazienti terminali dolenti e di parenti esclusi dagli ospedali. 

Ma è aria fritta perché quello che importa è stare bene noi e i nostri più stretti familiari. 

Dice: ma come la metti con i volontari che lavorano ore a scaricare casse e rifocillare la gente che non ha più da mangiare? 

Dice: ma come la metti con il personale paramedico, i medici continuamente esposti al contagio e molti di loro perdono la vita?  (Senza tenere conto degli odiatori professionali che sui social li vanno accusando di essere tra le poche categorie che ancora ricevono uno stipendio a fronte della disoccupazione generalizzata e crescente). 

Ci sono le invocazioni degli scienziati, degli esperti, dei politici, della gente di buon senso che invitano a usare la maschera permanentemente, tenere la distanza di sicurezza, lavarsi frequentemente le mani, evitare ogni contatto con altri. 

Ma evidentemente servono a poco perché basta considerare le immagini dei gates negli aeroporti in questi giorni che precedono il Thanks Giving Day per rendersi conto che l'appello a non viaggiare, a non contribuire alla diffusione del contagio per il gusto del mantenimento di una tradizione familiare che spesso non ha più senso causa la distruzione dei nuclei familiari, sta cadendo nel vuoto. 

Certo è bello poter riabbracciare i genitori e i nonni almeno una volta all'anno mostrando loro figli e nipoti. 

Quanto alla possibilità che proprio quegli anziani possano essere contagiati dalle apparenti manifestazioni di affetto formale dei giovani e meno giovani...perché proprio a noi deve succedere? 

Del resto il fatto che il virus stia scremando gran parte delle società mondiali falcidiando gli anziani fa scattare la molla (che non deve essere esternata) del: "meglio loro che me… E poi sono risorse che vengono lasciate disponibili alle altre generazioni…" 

Affermazioni crudeli? Provate a porvi queste domande nella segretezza della vostra coscienza. 

La pandemia e ogni epidemia, fanno scattare non solo sentimenti di amore ma fanno emergere anche la grettezza dell'istinto di sopravvivenza quello che in genere viene definito come lo "Spirito della Zattera della Medusa" (ricordate quella storia di cannibalismo tra i sopravvissuti di un naufragio?). 

Affermazioni molto crude ci dice un amico italiano nel corso di una conversazione Whatsapp 

Ce ne rendiamo conto così come ci rendiamo conto dell'insopportabile buonismo di facciata gettato a palate dai media per fare aprire il portafoglio alla gente. 

Oscar

_____________________________________________________

Per chi preferisce ascoltare 

 https://youtu.be/8V13pMce-lM